Awaiting reviewer invitation after minor revision reddit. This change has occurred .
Awaiting reviewer invitation after minor revision reddit I emailed, the editor sent a reminder, and the review then came back very quickly. During this period, we got a chance to make minor revision. I am not After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 26 awaiting AE recommendation 22. Did the editor find new reviewers for me? Minor Revision. After 28 days, it changed to "awaiting reviewer confirmation". This change has occurred Aug 16, 2024 · Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is in the process of assigning them to review your manuscript. The status has been stuck in "Under Review" since submission. Some more problems may pop-up. His comments are very minor and has nothing to do with technical or writing. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. 12. This change has occurred I submitted a journal article a few months ago and, after going through 1 round of major revisions, I just got a decision that the paper requires minor revisions. ’ How much more time should I wait for a response? Jul 31, 2021 · Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. The main concern of the reviewer was to add the details in methods section and some amendments in the text. ” I had this with one paper (Medical Care) and I think I had two of these rejections before the minor formatting revision pre-acceptance (longest submission process in my career; one year from first submission to acceptance). In addition, the academic editor initially assigned to it was also changed. This is for a couple of reasons: The reviewer has already read your manuscript, so they can review again quickly. After 6 weeks I got a decision to reject it though the editor-in-chief acknowledged that the peer review was positive!! in fact the two peer reviewers had only minor comments that should have led Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. However, after we made the revisions, the manuscript status changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. (To be sure, the kinds of minor revisions I've suggested may also be necessary as part of a broader slate of major revisions for an article. Aug 25, 2020 · Hi. Has anyone had this experience In the second instance, I got a bunch of "this paper is excellent, and should need only minor changes" messages from reviewer 1 and 2. Manuscripts quite often return to this stage if not enough of the invited reviewers accepted the invitation so further invitations need to be sent. While the comments of Reviewer 1 was really helpful and suggest minor revisions (which all can be revised in around 30 minutes), Reviewer 2 comments was pretty critical and some of the things they said doesn't even make any sense. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. (2) Accept after minor revision (no further review): At least one reviewer recommends “Accept after minor revision (no further review)”, and no “Reconsider (re-review) after major revision” or “Reject” is recommended. Mar 15, 2016 · A rejected paper is sometimes resubmitted to the same journal, after some revisions. 3. Aug 25, 2021 · I have a paper which was invited to be resubmitted after minor revisions. This change has occurred Jan 1, 2023 · For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. Proofread your revised work Once you have revised your submission, proofread and spell check it again. Now, again it So I got minor revision and just resubmitted it. Respond to a Review Invitation. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. Has anyone experienced similar situation? I have posted before and received answers saying that "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" can mean "With Editor. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. Most journals will try to catch this and either reject outright, or assign it to the same AE to handle. However, my supervisor told me several times when submitting papers that there's no such thing as minor revisions anymore and everyone seems to always say major just because they can. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After 4 days, it changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". The reviewer had critical comments on the first paper, which the editor will (naturally) want to see addressed - or at least answered satisfactorily. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. Also, the second round took 8 months. That said, it's very helpful if the same set of reviewers agree to review a revision. I remember the first time I got a major revision I sort of panicked too, but from my experience this is totally unnecessary! So congratulations, enjoy the moment and, go make that rebuttal! The initial peer reviews pointed out some flaws, so we were invited to submit a major revision. The first reviewer stated that if the article is re-written, it could be published. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. Major Revision: The manuscript may be accepted with major revisions. a) Is it possible to be rejected at this point? Aug 13, 2023 · In my case the system status showed a reviewer took a few weeks to accept the invitation, and then I waited for three months after that. May 1, 2021 · I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. Editorial review team inadvertently sent the revised paper to new reviewers instead of previous reviewers. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. I recently received two very positive reviews requiring minor edits in the IEEE Access journal. If your work gets rejected at ICML and you try again with the fixed version at NeurIPS, then this is akin to a minor/major revision at Journals. example of cover page for assignment; how to write a cover letter for delivery driver; to do or make a speech; what does assignment mean in education; explaining Apr 15, 2021 · Will the editor send the manuscript to the same reviewer? Very likely yes. Ofc I will talk about it with my coordinator but I wanted to know your opinions. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. If you intend for the reviewers to verify the revisions, you should NOT choose Minor Revision. Did you sent the updated version (after minor revision) in January -> two months it is fine to send an email to ask for an update Or did you sent your things 17th of March -> less then two weeks, so just be patient and if you haven't heard anything by mid April maybe email disclaimer: just my opinion, field and situation might differ. Thanks for your advice. I answered all the reviewers and resubmitted the article. The second one gave a more thorough review, raised some good questions, and said the general idea is good, but made no comment about whether the article should be published or not. [email protected] Submitted my paper. There’s only 1 comment, and I’ll probably submit the revision tomorrow- it won’t have to undergo peer review again, so I expect it will be accepted by next week. But I wouldn't make any assumptions about who or what reviewer three is. Awaiting Editor Decision Posted by u/Mountain-Ad-4557 - 17 votes and 29 comments Oct 1, 2012 · In my field (chemistry), the practice is: for those journals that make a clear distinction between minor and major revision requests, “major revision” means that the paper will have to undergo further review after revision, usually by the same referees, while “minor revision” means that while changes should be made, no further reviewing is needed. Sep 6, 2021 · A major revision was submitted to a journal. During reject and resubmit, I got comments from 2 reviewers, and I agree, minor revisions are entirely writing errors, while major revisions requires data reinterpretation. Or (in one system I know of), that the editor has not assigned the necessary number of reviewers. Reviewer 1 recommended acceptance with minor revisions and Reviewer 2 wanted major revisions before considering it further. But my question is as below. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. 22. Still this step is usually faster because the reviewers don't have to be "re-identified" (assuming they agree to review; otherwise it could take longer for a myriad of reasons). There were 3-4 little modifications required by referees. This means that the submission needs some minor work (as recommended by the reviewer) but For "good" business journals the rejection rate is something like: 30% desk rejected by the editor before going to review, 40-60% rejected in the first round of review, 10-20% rejected in subsequent rounds of review, only 5-10% papers submitted are actually published. From my own experience I once reveiced in a row major revision, minor revision, major revision. Never saw that happen. You said you recommended rejection twice now, and somewhat harshly because you perceived fatal flaws (that I assume you don't believe can be addressed in a revision). And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". 审稿人可能暂时不可用：原审稿人有 The comparison is also not quite fair, because there are no revisions at conferences. The status after 3 days . After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. I have submitted a paper to an Elsevier journal and have already gone through 4 rounds of peer review and the editors have suggested a major revision each time. After waiting for 2 months for the paper to be under review, my paper got rejected just after 5 days of review. Know what the reviewers have asked you to do. Time for the editor, the editorial staff, or even (possibly) one picky reviewer to check if your minor revision is okay. 3. 4 awaiting reviewer score 22. I submitted the revised manuscript after one-and-a-half months. 对于论文小修后出现"awaiting reviewer assignment"的情况，通常并不会直接返回给原来的审稿人来审稿。 原因有以下几点：1. Rarely rejected after minor revisions unless the author just doesn't make any revisions at all and doesn't qualify why. Choose “Minor revision” If reviewers are no longer required and AE wants to QC some key revisions. 28 submitted after minor revision 22. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After waiting 20 days for pending approval, the status now is reviewers invited. After you accept the invitation, you are expected to assess the paper and make one of the following Thanks. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I checked the link again after 3 days and I noticed that the date has changed to 19th of April (check the attached image) with the same status of "Review Complete". I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. Major revision requires lots of work but it rarely requires to repeat an experiment. Once you receive a review invitation, please respond at your earliest convenience even if you cannot review. Months later I received a "Minor Revision". Reviewer Videos: Aug 21, 2023 · 论文小修后await. I for example look at my assignments once a week. Depends on the exact definition of "major revision" for that journal. In both cases, you're making reviewer-suggested changes and sending your manuscript back. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. But from the Elsevier's tracking feature, I noticed one reviewer finished their review within 2 days of accepting the invitation. This may be true in some journals but not in others. Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. Then I revised and resubmitted. Mar 16, 2022 · I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. Is that a bad sign? Jul 23, 2021 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 5 months is quite a long time. However, after I performed minor edits and resubmitted it, it went to under-review. Nov 21, 2022 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. In my field, it means that major rework (and probably new experiments/analysis) is needed and that that the editor may not see a possible way forward for the paper, but is giving you a chance to submit the reworked paper to the journal. 08. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. Revise and resubmit is the same thing as revisions. A first round of peer review might take up to 8 weeks easily and finding reviewers also needs time. My question is how did it happen after minor revisions? From the start the 3rd reviewer was highly rejective while the first two positive. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". Now, 9 months later (4 months from the last round), still haven't received a decision from just 1 reviewer out of 3 (the other 2 already accepted). 编辑部或审稿人正在审稿，前者对稿件录用倾向做预期评估。 It is not unusual to introduce a new reviewer at the second review round. These revisions were trivial, and so I resubmitted after one week. 编辑已接手处理，正在邀请审稿人中。 7. Jan 8, 2021 · I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. Major Revision is great news! Pretty much everybody in the labs that I work in has major/minor revisions. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? Dec 22, 2015 · Depending in the journal, of course, I consider one week is OK. What do I do? So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. Feb 18, 2022 · Awaiting Reviewer Invitation This means that potential reviewers have been selected, but have yet to be invited. The Feb 15, 2023 · As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. Now what? Feb 18, 2022 | Scholarly publishing. , if one of the original reviewers was generally happy with your revisions and recommended acceptance (or minor revisions), but the other reviewer was not satisfied and recommended rejection. It is rare Aug 12, 2019 · I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. As a reviewer, you are under no obligation to continue providing reviews. Jun 9, 2021 · I was told that for paper with "minor revision," it is likely like it will not be sent back to the reviewers. I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. In my field (medical applications of physics, let's say) minor revision (at the first revision) is purely theoretical. My journal submission status is still “awaiting reviewer selection” after nearly 3 months. It is almost 5 months since resubmission. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. Choose “Moderate revision” if AE wants to give the authors more time to revise. This change has occurred That they haven't done that may be a sign that the third reviewer has asked for an extension. 07. Nov 5, 2019 · However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. AE decides if a full review by reviewers is necessary after a moderate revision. The fate of the manuscript can not be predicted for a favorable acceptance since the status changed to Under Review. May 6, 2021 · I don't know what "awaiting reviewer invitation" means. ’ Mar 13, 2022 · It has been 1. Add additional templates. When status changes to under review it means at least two reviewer have responded to the Jun 7, 2022 · 22. 17 Accepted asdfg12123 2022-02-04 At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". This is at Cell, but interested to hear from anyone with experience at Elsevier journals! 🤞🏼 Edit: got the email, they’ve sent invitations out to reviewers! It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). The Elsevier Tracking system shows the following: Detailed Reviewer Activity. Feb 28, 2021 · My paper underwent a revision. After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". However, I just noticed that the status of my revised manuscript Apr 27, 2023 · After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no further comments. I know it's typically a bad sign if the reviews as a whole take only a short time (for example, the paper has the "under review" status only for a few days). . I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). And when I navigate to the manuscript and select "view decision l Apr 5, 2021 · This has happened to me, and also as a reviewer, where an editor seek my comments on a paper after existing reviewers recommended minor revision; unfortunately for the authors, I recommended a reject. It's impossible to make a generalization across all journals and all specialties. They need to check whether you revise according to their reviews. Then after submiting the minor revisions and waiting for two months I got major revision request and I was shocked. However, the editor has sent out another review invitation (#5 Reviewer). What will be the Dec 19, 2019 · Once a revised paper is submitted, the editor can choose to send it for another round of peer review or review it himself/herself. Then, I have made all the necessary modifications and resubmitted. 03. Awaiting reviewer selection. But the status of the paper is showing "under review" again. Minor revisions should be verified by the AE and not sent back to the reviewers. This can happen, e. There were 3 different reviewers and they made very relevant comments that I found very useful. They basically said they would like me to resubmit it after “minor revision and modification” and “please outline every change made in response to their (reviewers’) comments and provide suitable rebuttals for any comments not addressed”. This will help us the AE to find other reviewers in a timely manner. 28 submitted 22. 04. 05 awaiting reviewer assignment 22. Now what I got is the 3rd reviewers comments only while others suggested publication. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. Different journals will explicitly say "revise and resubmit" or "we will be happy to look at this again after minor revision". Comments to Authors helps the authors improve their Apr 9, 2023 · I submitted an article to a certain top IEEE transaction journal, and after a year and a half of peer review, it was finally rejected. Feb 14, 2023 · After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo I just got a major revision request and the feedback seems pretty straightforward to address. With a typical ScholarOne configuration, "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that it is actually out with (at least some) reviewers, while "Under Review" would instead mean the previous stage, where it is being considered by the handling editor(s) and might still be rejected without review. ASE AU — ASE sends a revision decision to AU (if a revision is required) within one week, normally a couple of workdays. " Nov 19, 2020 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This means they only check whether a paper has sufficient reviewers every K month(s). 编辑很快做出决定。若未经审稿人评审（letter或correspondence除外），稿件几乎都会被拒绝。 6. 5. And I am sure neither of them was the initial reviewer. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. 29 submitted after Status on Editorial Manager changed from “With Editor” on Friday to “Under Review”. same "review complete" status but different date. Do I just keep waiting, send another email? What should I do with this frustrating A major revision would normally go back to the same reviewers and they would usually have as much time to review as the original submission. It sounded like their "under review" meant basically "Under Editor's Review". 01 awaiting reviewer invitation 22. Choose Minor Revision when you feel the paper should be accepted after slight revisions. The file of the manuscript with an overdue revision revision again. This change has occurred Aug 9, 2022 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. May 2, 2018 · I got minor revision in the first round of review. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. I’ve also had the “here’s a major revision, but f*** you if you can actually complete the work” long shot type of major revisions. Awaiting EA (Associated Editor) decision. I have his username and PW for the submission portal (because he provides them to me and has me do all the submissions). The new reviewers recommended rejection based on points we argue were incorrect. May I know is there any chances for at least to get a major revision. What does this mean? Meaning of change from Awaiting Reviewer Assignment to Awaiting Reviewer Selection Jan 7, 2019 · I have a paper on an Elsevier journal with "accept, minor revision". This change Oct 24, 2018 · I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 said `The authors have made all the modifications indicated. After another month, I got back the review, asking to work on minor revisions. This change has occurred Sep 10, 2020 · I submitted an article to an emerald journal a month ago and 4 days back, I received a decision mail stating this, 'The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some minor revisio Minor Revision - A Minor revision should only be used for papers that have a clear contribution, and there are only small changes that need to be made to make the paper ready for publication. Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? Hi everyone. And until now, the status has not changed for two months. Jul 16, 2019 · Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. Jun 24, 2023 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 05. The editor seemed enthusiastic about the paper, and asked for the revisions before acceptance. Now for the last 2 weeks, it's showing awaiting EIC. Outright acceptance of a journal paper is rare. After the review scores come back, a manuscript then 2. I have already addressed 4 peer-reviewers, and in my last submission I addressed the comments of the 4th reviewer. Handling the R&R is important. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. See Also. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. So if the editor started to search for an additional reviewer after receiving the first two reviewer reports, everything seems quite in time. In this case, however, the status went back to under review after I resubmitted. Jul 3, 2022 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Some journals have this weird category “reject with invitation to resubmit,” which functions as an alternative to “major revisions. After three weeks, I would consider asking for an update (I have edited the answer based on your updated precisions) – I had a manuscript that was rejected after "minor revision. Both reviews were positive about the future of the article. But in general, revise and resubmit with major revisions means that there are substantial changes that need to be made and you need to go to all possible lengths to satisfy the reviewers' comments. Other reviews are still in progress. How long does this phase generally take? How long should one wait before reaching out to the administrator? Thanks for the advice in advance. Does this mean it got sent to reviewers or the editor is evaluating it? Any experience here? It’s an Elsevier journal. Translation: 21. It roughly took around 19 days in total for this whole process. 1. " Does this mean that my manuscript needs to go through another round of review? Nov 16, 2015 · Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. Choose Major Revision if a paper has real potential, but a large component should Jan 31, 2024 · The status "Awaiting Referee Report" implies that the reviewers are already assigned and review work is in-progress. 17 major revision 22. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The identified Mar 5, 2019 · In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. 2 days ago · Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. I believe that reviewer purposefully delays our publication, for whatever reasons. ) Keep in mind that neither a major nor a minor revision are approving the paper as is. I don't understand this, am I going through a fresh round of peer review? Did they just invite a single reviewer to check my resubmission? Or is the editor "reviewing" it? It's an Elsevier journal, and it's my first Q1 submission. But usually, the paper with minor revision will be sent directly back to the same reviewers for the final decision. So, why has it returned to the referee(s) after last week's status?. But now, three weeks have passed and I wrote an email to the editor asking if everything is ok and if I can be of further assistance, and they then sent it for review immediately after. The manuscript is likely to be accepted after authors address requests for revision that do not involve major re-working of the data analysis and presentation or of the organization and text of the manuscript. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? Mar 10, 2020 · I submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses the ScholarOne system. Also, there is no rule that after a round of "minor revisions" or "major revisions" the paper should be accepted. Note that the time it takes for an editor to make a decision on your revision may vary depending on the editor's workload and the time of year. 06 awaiting reviewer scores. Yet to receive an email. But it's not uncommon to send the revised version back to the reviewers again to see if they're happy with it. 2. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. Nov 12, 2020 · I submitted my article earlier this year in January. You might want to work through your submission chronologically, by reviewer, or perhaps attempt the more minor revisions first. I made the changes, and then they each sent out lists with 6 or so substantive changes (eg re-work this 4 page discussion section to respond to X idea). This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After six months, I received the reviews and was asked to do major revisions. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. Reviewer reminders; Alternative reviewer suggestion for papers with overdue reviewers. " Related reading: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? Peer Review in Progress. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. Dec 4, 2017 · In some journals reviewer assigned status meant that reviewer has been sent the review invitation. It is just guessing. The Editor has sent me an email and invited me to an R&R (revise and resubmit). Now I am curious about what this might mean. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. Feb 26, 2021 · After almost three weeks of being in Awaiting Reviewer Assignment, the status has changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". " What was odd was that the two reviewers for the second round did not talk about my revision at all, but treated the manuscript as a new submission. This change has occurred Mar 13, 2022 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. If changes to the methodology is needed or simulations need to be run, then major I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. After submitting the minor revision, the status changed to under review and pending approval. Assess and Recommend. 4 Minor revision after second review, 22. How should this double status be interpreted? Is the revised manuscript with the editor or reviewers, or both? Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. Also, you can do it sooner next time, after a month or so; 2. After 5 months I received a "Major revision". It’ll take work and a second revision after this one most likely, but I’m confident we will get it done. 2 of my papers came back as major revisions but it took maybe 2 hours of editing grammer and spelling to Jun 20, 2023 · After the minor revision was uploaded, it has been showing "awaiting reviewer invitation". Under review. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. For example, minor revisions would not entail conducting a bunch of new analyses or overhauling part of the manuscript. Reviews completed: 0 Review invitations accepted: 0 Review invitations sent: 2+ Why does it take too long for a reviewer to either accept o reject a revision invitation? and What should I do about this? A positive response may be more likely if you tailor the invitation to the reviewer; If there is a specific reason why you are inviting them, then include a note on this toward the beginning of the invitation. This change has occurred Mar 13, 2022 · If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. Scenario 2: awaiting reviewer selection>> under review If this was the way the status had changed A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). It has been over two weeks, but the status is still displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo They likely have requested another review. It's different for every journal. This change has occurred Aug 31, 2019 · I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. Your article has secured the minimum number of required reviewers. Sep 20, 2017 · It typically means that the paper has been received, has been put in the work queue of the editor, but the editor has not assigned reviewers. AU AE — AU submits a revision to AE, within five weeks for a minor/moderate revision, eight weeks for a moderate revision, and 10 weeks for a moderate/major revision. I wonder if I should reply to this email, something like "Thank you for your time. I submitted a manuscript in late August, and the article's status hasn't changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" in the last four weeks. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. Mar 11, 2021 · 5. The Latest Articles. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. I'm not the corresponding author, but I asked the corresponding author, and he said he hasn't gotten emails from the journal. I submitted a paper to an Elsevier's journal. If the paper is not rejected, there are three possible recommendations: “accept (as is)”, “minor revision”, and “major revision”. There's plenty of reasons for a minor delay like this. I know the next stage is to Editor In chief. The comments were entirely new. however, for minor revisions, the editor often does not feel the need to send the paper to external reviewers again. I would recommend asking respectfully, showing that you understand they are busy. 16 awaiting Editor-in-Chief decision, 22. You/your corresponding author can absolutely reach out to the editor and politely ask what the situation is. A minor revision usually means that only textual changes are needed. Aug 4, 2021 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. We made the changes requested in the minor revision. g. Normally, the editor decides the outcome after this. After getting a moderate revision for the manuscript and resubmitting it, it is possible to get moderate revision again, or minor revision, or accept directly without any further edits. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. There is nothing wrong with but it can be annoying as it can delay the publication of the work. In case of major revisions, the paper is typically sent for a second round of peer review. 20 awaiting AE recommendation, awaiting EIC decision, minor revision 22. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection process again. Pretty much the best outcome one can hope for in my field (biomedical science) when submitting to a decently high IF journal, I think? Do most of the post peer review rejections with these journals come after the first round of review? Jul 18, 2019 · I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. One needs to wait until the review reports are received. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. I re-submitted the paper after incorporating these changes in the manuscript (I work in Biology field). After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". Feb 17, 2021 · Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. tpvlzgkedcwkgbwtbcljaxtlharqvnarfcwftltrfictbhjt