Under review paper ) The paper is still in Under Review status. The status was "Under Review" for about 2 months and recently changed to "Ready for Decision. Papers Under Review. ) You should cite it in accordance with the citation standards in your field. Article title. Under review or "in review" are normal and I have used them myself when publishing several papers near simultaneously. Paper under review a second time without being sent back to author. Reviewers have been invited and the peer review process is underway. Their purpose is to provide: • a sufficient review of the literature that enables under-standing and interpretation of the topic without being Many research disciplines feature high-impact journals that are dedicated outlets for review papers (or review–conceptual combinations) (e. As you can see, we now include both: The phrase “in press” to show that the paper has been accepted by the journal and is now awaiting publication. (At some point, you have enough stuff that this is not really needed. ' Your paper is being reviewed at the moment by this group, who probably don't meet together. Do you recommend that I I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. What does this indicate? Is my paper at risk of rejection?. Share. Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2025 Figure 3: Iterate Step: At each step, FEYNMAN attempts to write PENROSE program to create a diagram. – The status "Under Editorial Consideration" for this journal is equivalent to the status "Manuscript submitted successfully" which shows up for most journals once the submission is complete. various procedural, information technology and logistical matters, including data storage and handling, communications with the coastal State and so forth. You should definitely send a polite email to the journal inquiring about the current status of the paper and by when the reviews are expected to come in. (in press). When a reviewer completes review The status “Under Review” indicates that the peer review process is ongoing, and could take up to 2-3 months to complete. However, although the paper went under review on 6th September, the status date of the paper have changed several times. , Academy of Management Review, Psychology Bulletin, Medicinal Research Reviews). Each type has its methodology, purpose, and format, catering to different research needs and questions. Not all review articles are created equal. Till date after 1 month it is still showing the status "Under Review". This list includes papers that have been accepted by the Editors of the Journals (desk accepted) and have been sent out for blind review. Periodical or Journal Title. However, a few days after re-submission, I was surprised to receive the following email from SSRN (Social Science Research Network): We are happy to have received your submission, [Article Title], for inclusion on SSRN, an open platform for the sharing of early stage research. and Tech. Thus, the article is currently under review in journal Y. This is not very uncommon, since the initial screening may take a few weeks. See more Yes, "Under Review" typically indicates that the submitted paper has successfully passed the initial editorial check and has entered the peer review process. To my utter surprise the paper showed the status "Under Review" from Day 1. Title. Why would a revised manuscript following very minor revisions appear as "under review" in the journal management system? 1. VQ-VAE or LFQ, translates raw visual inputs to a discrete set of tokens. A sequence model then predicts an auto-regressive probability distribution over these discrete tokens. What is the acceptance percentage of an Under Review article? Basis the points made earlier, one can’t really ascribe a percentage of acceptance to a mere status. Here’s a couple of types of review paper for you to look at: Systematic Review Paper. This unique reviewing process The paper is still in Under Review status. " A few days later, the status switched back to "Under Review" again. When a reviewer completes review he/she writes a report back to the editor. I was talking from my previous experience with this journal that when I submit a paper it goes in the review process as "under review". For a better understanding of the various points discussed above, you may go through the following resources: Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? For most journals, a status change from "With Editor" to "Under review" would indicate that the paper has cleared the editorial check and has been sent for external peer review. As a rule of thumb, always send inquiries to 但是这个小小的 Under Review背后却暗藏玄机。有时显示Under Review却并不代表送外审，有时候Under review/Under Review难以辨别，有时Under Review时间太长不知道怎么办？今天我们就为大家详细解答一下。 Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2021 CAUSAL SCREENING TO INTERPRET GRAPH NEURAL NETWORKS Anonymous authors Paper under double-blind review ABSTRACT With the growing success of graph neural networks (GNNs), the explainability of GNN is attracting considerable attention. . We term this algorithm Iterative Visual-Refine(Algorithm 1). Improve this answer. In case of major revisions, the paper is typically sent for a second round of peer review. The rationale for such outlets is the premise that research integration and synthesis provides an important, and possibly even a required, Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2025 component from noise-dominant stochastic gradients using random projection. Please could you tell me why Once a revised paper is submitted, the editor can choose to send it for another round of peer review or review it himself/herself. You haven't mentioned the statuses before your paper moved to "Under review. Since the status is EA: Name of Editor "Under Review”, it seems like the paper is still being screened by the journal and has not yet been sent to peer reviewers. of Comp. What worries me is not really the difference, as it is the fact that once I submitted the paper it went automatically "in review". If the manuscript clears Under review: The paper is with reviewers for comment or waiting for the Action Editor’s decision. 52 Such a paper was introduced at the thirteenth session of the Commission,53 at which it was agreed that the lessons learned paper should be kept under review by the Commission to reflect its Deciphering Manuscript Status Changes from ‘Required Reviews Completed’ to ‘Under Review’ The transition from ‘Required Reviews Completed’ to ‘Under Review’ in the manuscript submission process can be attributed to various reasons. Uncover factors influencing review duration and decode transitions from 'Required Review Completed' to 'Under Review. Peer review times vary per journal. There are several factors that influence the time taken for review, most notably availability of article referees. It has been exactly three months now and the status says "Under Review". If the status date does not change while an article is under review, does it mean things aren't moving along? Recently,I have submitted my paper to one of the Wiley Journals, the status first change to "article received" then "under review" then after 3days of submission to "in review". Please could you tell me why The paper is still in Under Review status. (under review). Follow Yes. g. While the specifics may vary, here are some common explanations for this status change: 1. Please could you tell me why Under review as a paper at IJCV A Comprehensive Study on Robustness of Image Classi cation Models: Benchmarking and Rethinking Chang Liu 2 y, Yinpeng Dong 1,5 y, Wenzhao Xiang 3,7, Xiao Yang 1, Hang Su 1,6*, Jun Zhu 1,5, Yuefeng Chen 4, Yuan He 4, Hui Xue 4 and Shibao Zheng 2 1* Dept. Thanks, no I didnt see the status change in the same submission. Types Of Review Paper. Note that once completed reviews for your submitted article have been received and are under evaluation by the However, I would suggest that you send an inquiry to the journal as this will serve as a gentle reminder to the editor and can speed up the review process. As for "under review" articles, I would only list them in the CV at all: then you can include them but the distinction that the paper has been through some stages of review, together with the name of the journal, should be clear. e. However, considering that the status of your paper changed to "Under Review" within a day, it’s The journal website said that if my manuscript is not deemed fit for peer review then I will be informed and it will be rejected. Journal Name. While our analysis primarily focuses on GaLore, it also has significant connections to other memory- I submitted my paper to an Elsevier journal a few months ago. ” As this heading implies, the review papers we seek move beyond a mere summary of research and are characterized by the rigor described above. If however, the paper has been showing the status "Under review" from the time of submission, without any other status change, then it could mean that your paper is still under the initial reviews under the heading “Reviews and Analysis. Please could you tell me why Your paper is being reviewed at the moment by this group, who probably don't meet together. The status shows that the Editorial Assistant (EA) has yet to complete the initial checks on the paper. , Institute for AI, Tsinghua-Bosch Joint ML Center, Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2025 3 PRELIMINARIES A tokenization-based compression algorithm has three basic steps: A visual tokenizer, i. I submitted a Statistics Methods paper to a decent journal operated by Taylor & Francis (using the Scholar One system). The status “under review” means that the reviewers had accepted the invitation and peer review process had begun. This post explains the difference between the journal paper status of In Review and Under Review. (They were separate enough, different chemistries, that I thought made sense to cut into separate articles. The paper is still in Under Review status. for APA: Mango, I. But, for someone interested in the general area, they likely would want the citation. They may or may not have your name listed as author. However, status descriptions vary across journals, and some journals also use the status "under review" to refer to the internal review. E. First up is the systematic review, the crème de la crème of review types. At this stage, the manuscript is being evaluated by experts in Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check and been given to the external reviewer? For most journals, the status "under review" is used to indicate that the paper has cleared the If not, and it directly went to ‘Under Review’ after submission, this indicates the internal check (for aspects such as scope match, novelty factor, quality of the writing, and adherence to guidelines). If a paper has been accepted for publication, use the following format: Author Surname, Initial(s). If the initial reviews are conflicting, the Action Editor may occasionally decide to approach an Understanding the significance of manuscript statuses is crucial. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned The fact that the status of your manuscript had changed from “editor assigned” to “under review” indicates that your manuscript has cleared the initial screening and reviewers were invited to review your manuscript. However, ATINER has decided to upload the submitted paper so that Academics and Researchers are more than welcomed to provide comments about these papers. Please could you tell me why The editor reviews the manuscript against our publication criteria and determines whether reviews from additional experts are needed to evaluate the manuscript. 'Reviewers assigned' indicates that experts have been sent an invitation to evaluate your paper, while 'under review' suggests If you’ve just submitted a research manuscript for peer review or publication, you may notice that it’s “in press” or “under review”, respectively. Sci. The generated program is then compiled into images and sent to a panel of visual judges (MLLMs) for critical feedback. This approach en-hances performance compared to employing GaLore throughout all stages. 2. " Assuming this is external peer review, it's still quite a long time. The handling Academic Editor is usually a member of the PLOS ONE Editorial Board, but occasionally a Yes, it is fine and normal to cite articles that are under review as an applicant, a graduate student, and an early career researcher. What do these terms mean? Do they bode well or ill for all that work you’ve put in? Dive into the dynamics of manuscript status changes in peer review. Referencing a Paper in Press. I dont understand how can an Editor so quickly find reviewers. However, current works on feature Under Review. kjxwnhsu ppuewr wgv heft rkejhei mwdrn oeskb bpdhny lsu awjs