Editor assigned after under review springer. I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal.
- Editor assigned after under review springer On Nov 22, the status was showing "reviews completed". You have not mentioned how long it has been since you submitted your paper; however, if it has been more than a month, This is the normal practice of peer-reviewed journals. Until August 13, the status was Editor Assigned. Lượt xem: 57. Thus the subsequent status “under review” means that the manuscript has been sent Where an Editor is on the author list or has any other competing interest regarding a specific manuscript, another member of the Editorial Board will be assigned to oversee peer review. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Editor assigned after under review Springer. The status changed to "Under review" on April 27, 2018 and then "Required reviews completed" on October 4, 2018. I couldn't understand what it means: is it under review or not? I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. After resubmitting, its status changed to "Editor Assigned," "under review," and after about 7 days it became "Editor assigned" again. "Decision in process" means the editor has made a recommendation to the editor-in-chief. I've submitted my paper to a Springer journal. After the editoral review, the reviewers were invited, and then the status changed to "Reviewers assigned" for two months. Also known as: with editors (APS), waiting for potential reviewer assignment (AIP), under review , assigned to the editor (NPG) Typical duration: This strongly depends on the journal: With some journals, it is less than a week; with others it may take a month, in particular if several people are involved in the decision or the initial quality I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. Thereafter, reviewers are assigned/invited for the manuscript, hence the status ‘reviewer assignment pending’ right after editorial screening. Editors Editors invite you to review as they believe that you are an expert in a certain area. Could you possibly tell me how long I should wait for that status before sending a reminder mail. On the 60th day of submission I had enquired about the manuscript status with the journal office, I got a mail saying that they would ask the editor to speed up the process (either will render a The peer review process is not new. This means that the peer review of the second revision is over, and now, the handling editor – When a submitted manuscript is with an Associate Editor, journals appear to use phrases such as “with editor” or “editor assigned. ” When sent for peer review, phrases such as “reviewers invited” It is normal, you are now entering the stage that takes an unfortunately unknown period of time: the search for reviewers. If the authors revise and resubmit the manuscript after review, the editor will often review the changes to decide if the reviewer comments have been fully addressed. The manuscript was under review for a duration of five months. The newly assigned editor will receive an email letting them know that they have been assigned a manuscript. This was my question. Some journals send reviewers the comments of other reviewers on the same manuscript along with the decision letter; reading these comments can help you improve your future reviews. Depending on the journal, the assignment may be done by technical staff, the journal's chief editor, or automatic by submission category or author suggestion. Since the day of submission status of the manuscript has been “Editor assigned”. What could be the reason for the current status? Is the review process completed or are more Note that this might be the case for journals besides those published by Springer as well. After passing the initial check, it stayed with the "Reviewers Assigned" status until 12 Oct and went Under Review on 13 Oct. But when I submitted the revised article since day 2 it's status is "editor assignment pending" for almost 2 weeks. Under Review: if Reviewers have accepted the invitation. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. I sent an email to the editor to ask him to increase the speed of review process and he answered that the review will be competed unit the end of the coming week. ” The assigned editor can now take a call on whether to send your manuscript for peer review. However, the status of my paper is now "Editor assigned" on October 9, Editors invite you to review as they believe that you are an expert in a certain area. However, it remained at "Editor Assigned" for two days, and the date changed on 29th Avril. I submitted a manuscript to a Springer journal. However, the Under Review status changed to Reviewers Assigned on Oct 17 and again to Reviewers Assigned on Oct 19. I have a paper which was submitted to one of Springer journals 3 months ago and for more than 2 months its status was "under review". Go to the 'Submissions' section on the dashboard. - Editor Assignment Pending: Dec 30, 2013 - Under Review: Jan 2, 2013 I always have to write back saying that the Editor will render a decision as soon as they can. Why is it taking such a long time with the editor? I have I have submitted my review paper to one of the top journals of Springer. ' On May 21, our paper's status changed to 'Editorial assignment pending. After the editorial review, the reviewers were invited, and the status changed to 'Reviewers Assigned. After a third revision, I got an email from the editorial office saying that my paper has been accepted for publication. Hope this helps. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Stage 2: Editor assigned Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. Now, again it It is equally unethical and sad that, some editors do not communicate the outcome of manuscripts 2,3,4,5, even 10 months after it has been reviewed and rejected. After three months I A manuscript of mine was accepted by a Springer journal on January 2020 provided that I executed some corrections indicated by one of the reviewers in the second round of reviews. I had submitted a paper to a Springer journal on 29th may 2019. Select the submission. Through a letter to the editor, I sent the updated manuscript addressing all the Respected Sir/Mam, I submitted a paper to a Springer journal about 2 months ago. One day later, the status changed as "editor assigned". The status "Editor assignment pending" means that your paper has still not been assigned to an AE. I find it strange that reviewers have already been selected and that reviews have already Once the review begins, the status will change to “Under review. While Editorial Manager provides editors with the tools to display granular status to authors, it is ultimately up to the journal’s Sir, I have submitted my manuscript on Oct 27, after three days it was assigned to reviewers and status changed to "under review". Also, it is not uncommon for the status to remain “Editor assigned” for more than a month as editors often handle multiple submissions at a time. After one week, the status changed to 'Reviewers Assigned,' and it remained so for one day. Describe the major revisions to your manuscript in your response letter followed by point-by-point responses to the comments raised. After the paper was in the With Editor status for about a month, it went to Under Review for about four months. The status "required reviews completed" was shown After two revisions (the first major and the second minor), the Editor Assigned status means that the manuscript is with the Associate Editor (AE) to review the second round of changes and also the manuscript as a whole. I submitted a paper 10 months ago to Springer on behalf of Pramana – Journal of Physics. Subsequently, the date of the status changed to 13th July while the status remained the same. I submitted a paper to a Springer-based journal on 1st July, 2020. After several weeks I received an email saying that"Based on the advice received, the Editor feels that your manuscript could be accepted for publication should you be prepared to incorporate minor revisions". After that, it changed to "under review" but now, after 20 days, again it changed to "reviewers assigned. This historical precedence was followed by a relatively informal process in which some editors of journals would seek reviews of manuscripts on a case-by-case basis. One month later, major revision was suggested. I have not been asked for a revision. I submitted a manuscript to a Springer journal on 14th August and the status changed to "Reviewer assigned" on 20th August. For 3-4 days, the status of my manuscript status was showing to be Editor Assigned and after that status changed to Under Review. What does it mean? Meaning of the Editor Assigned status for the third time after 2 months of under review The status “Editor Assigned” means that your paper was assigned to an Associate Editor (AE) who would be responsible for your manuscript till the first decision. What does it mean? Has it received good reviews or Each new submission is assigned to a primary editor, who reads the paper, consults with the other editors, and then evaluates the novelty and potential impact of the work, the appropriateness for I submitted to a Springer journal on August 5, and the status changed to Under Review on August 13. July 1: I made the initial submission. The main status says under review. However, suddenly, the status changed from 'Under Review' to 'Editor Assigned. Recently I submitted minor revision to springer journal. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned for the next two days then again changed to under review for I had an article on Theoretical and applied climatology. I have come across some Springer journals that use "Under review" to refer to the initial admin check before the Associate Editor (AE) is assigned. However, today (25th April), I received another update, "Editor declined invitation". On 21st July, the status changed to 'Editor Assigned. In fact, this also probably means that the reviewer invitations have not been sent out yet. They have given a major revision decision twice. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned I submitted a paper for Springer Journal and it said "editor invited," then after one month it said "editor assigned," and now it says “Under Review". It has been 62 days since submission. The timeline went from Editor invited (is editor a subject or a direct object?) on September 2 to reviews received (not reviewers received) on September 12 (see pic here). Thanks in advance. Since the status of your paper changed to "under review" half a day after being "with Hi all! I submitted a manuscript in January this year, and it didn't make any progress until late March. The status “With editor” When revising your manuscript and responding to peer review comments you must: Thank the reviewers and editors for their time and comments. For 3 days, the status of my manuscript remained ‘Editor Assigned’ and then changed to ‘Under Review’. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned It is not unheard of for editors to have to invite seven or more reviewers in order to obtain two peer reviews, especially around holiday seasons. Ngày đăng: 07/12/2021. Based on these checks, the journal editor will decide whether the manuscript can be sent further for a peer review. After that, it changed to Editor Assigned, and has been the same since January 17. In case of major revisions, the paper is typically sent for a second round of peer review. The reason why this stage can take time Some examples include “editor assigned,” “reviewers invited,” “under review,” “review complete,” “decision pending,” and others. No further reviews or responses were requested by the reviewers. However, the change of status from “Editor Assigned” to “Editor Invited” indicates that the assigned editor has declined the request to handle your paper. Does the status Decision in Process mean or I submitted my manuscript to a Springer-based journal on July 1. This April, we received the reviewer's response and resubmitted after correction on May 18. Then, the status changed to Required Reviews Completed. Peer review is an integral part of scientific publishing that confirms the validity of the science reported. After waiting 8 months, still, it was " With Editor". After two months, the status changed to "reviewers assigned" and it remained the same for one day. Reviewers Invited: the review invitation has been sent to Reviewers. The journal editor will also check whether the manuscript falls within the scope of the journal. ' What does this mean? I had submitted my paper to one of the Springer journals in the month of July 2017. The corresponding author should be prepared to collect documentation of compliance with ethical standards and send if requested during peer review or after publication. How much time will it take as one month is already over. I've published in medical journals, in physics/engineering journals and in neuroscience ones. For a potential author, every day is important. Both the reviewers asked for minor corrections and found the manuscript technically correct and interesting to read. The article took 5 months and I got decision with minor revision. While the differences in average review time between one field and another are staggering (one month for the Whole process in neuroscience, 8 months in engineering), usually it's something like you don't even see the choice of the editor and maybe it's 3-4 days between when it gets to So paper's status is your revised paper was submitted -> journal office invites editor-in-chief -> waiting for editor-in-chief to invite handling editor. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week. The status now is "Editor Assigned. Now, it has changed to ‘Under review. The status "Editor invited" means that an Associate Editor(AE) has been invited for your paper. This means that one or more initially assigned peer reviewers were unable to review the manuscript for any or all of a variety of reasons: unavailability, identified conflict of interest, and a mismatch with their field. After a month, the status of my manuscript changed from "editor assigned" to "under review. What is known is that “Environment, Development and Sustainability” If the status changed to "under review" directly after submission without showing any other status before it, your paper was probably under the internal admin check and not I have come across a submission changing from "under review" to "reviewer invited", which sometimes implies that a reviewer objected to further reviewing a manuscript or one of the reviewers Q: What does a change to Editor Assigned mean after the completion of reviews for a major revision? I submitted a review paper to a Springer-based journal. Till now the status is same. Then I re-submitted the revised form. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Peer review is a positive process. At the same time, journals may opt to display fewer statuses. ' After two days (on April 10), the status changed to 'Under Review'. The various status I have submitted my manuscript to a Springer journal. It has existed in various forms since the eighteenth century when The Royal Society of London assigned peers to serve on the “Committee on Papers” []. On March 24, it changed to Required Reviews Completed, and then, changed to Decision in Process. What does it mean? Thank you very much. What I have heard was that minor revision does not Q: What does “Editor assigned” mean after “Under review” for a revised manuscript? My manuscript was first returned by a Springer journal for minor revisions. . The status of the paper was 'Submitted. They told me that the manuscript was going to be passed to Production after that. Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check and been given to the external reviewer? I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. August 14: It went Under Review. " This status has lasted for I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. September 15: I received a major revision decision. Now, again it I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. They gave me 30 days’ time [to make the changes]. Select 'Reassign submission' under the 'Actions' button. e. Since you have already written to the journal and they have responded, there's not much you can do right now. In April, the status changed from "Editor Assigned" to "Editor declined invitation" and after one week "Editor Assigned" and then "Reviewers assigned". After that, I have withdrawn the article and submitted elsewhere. From August 14 to September 6, it showed as Under Review. Now status After resubmitting, its status changed to "Editor Assigned," "under review," and after about 7 days it became "Editor assigned" again. One and a half months later, the status of the paper was still "under review", but the date of status has changed. Could you please tell me what is the meaning of under review and My experience with a springer journal "under consideration" means "under review" and it lasted 1 month after the first month under the status "with editor". ” I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. Unless the handling editor is inactive (which she isn't, since she answered your query), it would be pretty unusual for the editor who handled the original paper to not handle the revised one. ’. when the managing editor/editor in chief assigned particular MS to associate/handling editor depending upon there research arena, the MS The system in most Transactions lets you change the minimum number of reviews so that the status is "Under Review" rather than "with Associate Editor". After incorporating the comments of reviewers, I resubmitted the paper. In such instances, the editor seeks an alternative reviewer to ensure a comprehensive evaluation. " It is unlikely that the journal has failed to update the status in spite of sending your manuscript for review. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Some journals might use "reviewers" assigned" to mean "under review. A month later (on May 1), it changed to 'Reviewers Assigned' again, and is still the same status. What can cause the date in the submission system to change in the absence of a change in status? Q: What does “Editor assigned” mean after “Under review” for a revised manuscript? My manuscript was first returned by a Springer journal for minor revisions. Cite 4 Recommendations Statuses and status updates vary across journals. Can anybody suggest what does it actually mean and is there any other stage before the decision is made? I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. Trả lời: 0. I sent an email to the handling editor. I'm guessing that the editor-in-chief disagreed with the editor, and either assigned a different editor or sent the manuscript back to the editor. Could you please tell me what is the meaning of this status? And how I can approach the editorial office For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned for the next two days then again changed to under review for I have a paper on a Springer journal with "Accept - with minor revision with1-2 little modifications related to citations of the references and refereence list ". Once the invitations are sent to reviewers, the status changes to "Under Review" Last December, I submitted my paper to a Springer Nature journal. " I submitted a paper to a Springer journal about 2 months ago. What does this brief "Under review" means? Why dit I have submitted a manuscript to a Springer journal and the status has been “Editor Assigned” for 5 weeks. " If the status changes to "Under review," you can rest assured that your paper has cleared the initial editorial screening. (same day)-->under review-----(after 16 I submitted a paper to one of the Springer Journals through Editorial Manager almost 5 months back. Is my manuscript heading to peer review or desk reject? The journal editor will screen the manuscript to gauge its scientific value and adherence to journal requirements. The status of my paper I submitted my manuscript on Oct 5 in a Springer Psychology journal. Related reading: What does a status change from from "with editor" to "under review" mean for a Springer journal? It's impossible to know what "Editor Assigned" means without knowing the particulars of the journal's system. What does this mean and what is the probability of rejection? I submitted an accepted paper after a second revision to a springer journal on 24th Avril and the status stayed at "Revisions Being Processed " for two days. Cite 2 Recommendations I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. This status change does occur occasionally. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Once a revised paper is submitted, the editor can choose to send it for another round of peer review or review it himself/herself. After two months the rest of the journal decided to invite a new editor, causing the status to move back to "editor invited". However, if the status changes directly to "Decision in process" after "Editor assigned" or "With Editor," it is an In Springer journals, normally, how much time does it take to come to the Under Review stage? My colleagues who have worked as reviewers for Springer journals have said that the editor will provide a maximum of 45 days. We have answered similar queries before; you might find the answers useful: What does "Editor assigned" mean after "Under review" for a revised manuscript? How long does it take for the status to change from "reviewers assigned" to "under review"? I submitted my manuscript to a journal. Through the peer-review process, manuscripts should become: Since the status changed directly from "Editor Invited" to "Under review," and there was no other status such as "Editor Assigned" or "With Editor" in between, it seems unlikely that your paper was sent out for peer review. However, while the status has remained unchanged, the date has changed several times and the change seems to be regular: August 13 > September 7 > September 22 > October 7 > October 22. If they [the reviewers] don't reply [by then], the editor will cancel the reviewer and send it to another reviewer. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Once the editor has accepted the invitation, the manuscript status will change to “Editor assigned. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned I submitted a paper to a Springer journal about 2 months ago. It was still "Reviewer assigned" as per the last updated status on 31st August. The status changed from Editor Assigned to Under Review and now it is showing "Reviews Completed" since past five days. however, for minor revisions, the editor often does not feel the need to send the paper to external reviewers again. I submitted the revised manuscript after making the corrections as suggested by the reviewers. The paper was reviewed again and after a few months the status was shown as "reviews completed". Keep in mind that reviewing manuscripts, like research and teaching, is a valuable contribution to science, and is worth making time for I had submitted a manuscript to a Springer journal. After going through the reviewers’ comments, the editor will make a decision about your manuscript. 18th of July, the status is showing “Editor assigned. Hello. ' Is it under review again or has the editor not seen my paper? Could you please clarify? I had submitted my preprint to a journal on March 15, 2018. After subsequent changes in the status, finally it showed “Reviews completed” on 5th of July. " I submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal using Editorial Manager on February 27, 2020. "With editor" means an editor has been assigned, but no reviewers have been invited yet. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned I have submitted a manuscript to a Springer journal. I had submitted a review article in one of the springer journals one year ago and the status form 11 months was "Reviewers assigned" but the date was changing every 10-12 daysone week ago sent I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. Here is a timeline of the changes. After that, it changed to 'Under Review. If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience I submitted a manuscript to Springer Journal. Some examples include editor assigned, reviewers invited, under review, review complete, decision pending, and others. Now, the status has changed to Reviews Completed. Does this mean the After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should be sent for peer review. A week before status date only updated but current status remains same. What does this status mean? Is it a bad sign or a good sign that the reviews were completed in 23 days? The status “Decision in process” after “Under review” means that all the reviews have come in and the editor is evaluating your paper based on the reviewer’s comments. What could be the possible reason for such a change? Does this mean, I have to wait at least another four months to get a first decision? My manuscript had an Editor Assigned status for the 3rd time after 2 month under review and a reviewer assigned status 2nd time. Three weeks later, the status has changed to Decision in Process. Required Reviews Complete: a minimum number of reviews was submitted. One possibility is that the "under review" status referred to the initial admin check post which a manuscript is assigned to an editor. October 25: It went Under For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned for the next two days then again changed to under review for Hello! My coauthor and I submitted a paper to one of Springer's journals at the end of August. Choose a new editor to handle the submission. Did anyone encounter the same I submitted an article to springer. Is The most probable explanation is that the assigned editor is inactive and did not invite reviewers (which would also explain why you never saw the status change to "under review"). There can be four possible outcomes: Accept; Reject Editor’s Decision in Progress: A change in status from ‘Required Reviews Completed’ to ‘Under Review’ may signify that the editor has successfully gathered all the necessary reviews from the assigned reviewers. Finally today, i. I'll presume this is different than what you saw during the prior round of review, however, and it would in fact be unusual for a paper to be stuck with an editor for two months without going out for review. I’m not sure whether this status is because the Springer journal does not use the status “Under review,” or because just the process is delayed. " However, after only a week the status changed to "with editor. If so, the admin review is complete, and the manuscript should now Recently, I submitted a paper to a journal. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Recently, I submitted my manuscript after major revisions to a Springer journal. The status changed to "Editor Assigned" on the 27th. I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. What does it mean? My manuscript has still not been sent for peer review. Finally, the status changed to ‘Required reviews completed. So, why the sudden shift from 'under review' to 'reviewers assigned'? This change typically occurs when one of the original reviewers declines to review your manuscript, after accepting the invitation. While the first change was 25 days after the first change, since then, Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. October 15: I uploaded the revised manuscript. Then, I have made all the necessary modifications and resubmitted. ' I understand that this is the initial screening. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Rather, probably the journal assigned an editor to your submission, but the editor did not want to handle it (because e. On the other hand, editors must also be mindful that local/regional holidays should not be used as a reason to keep authors waiting. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Q: What does “Editor assigned” mean after “Under review” for a revised manuscript? My manuscript was first returned by a Springer journal for minor revisions. What does it mean? The article will be handled by new editor? Or the editor is making final decision based on our revised Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Should I inquire the journal about the exact status? Your advice would be appreciated. What does it mean? Has it received good reviews or I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. So, you could wait for two-three weeks. The status was "With Editor" for one day, then on the next it changed to "reviewers assigned". Now the status of the paper has been changed I submitted a mechanical-related review paper to a Springer journal. Both reviewers asked me to add more literature and enhance the figures' quality. g. Since 10 days, the online tracking system has been showing "reviewers assigned" as the current status. Based on the peer review recommendation, the assigned editor has to make a decision regarding the final fate of the article: accept, revise, reject. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned I submitted a manuscript to a Springer journal after a major revision. But now it's been more than a month and this status is not changing. After two months of submission, I received a decision for major revision. I have submitted a manuscript in a Springer journal Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing on October 10, 2017. The paper was reviewed and the reviewers asked for some changes. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Hello, I have experienced a manuscript tracking that is a little odd. However, this change should not be cause for I have submitted a paper to a Springer journal on 21 st July. What does it mean? Has it received good reviews or not? Usually, the “Editor Assigned” The reviews have been completed and the system administrator or the journal manager assigned the editor (who is assumed to be associated with it earlier) to take care of the review reports So, your re-revised manuscript has moved to Editor Assigned after Under Review. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned I sent a manuscript to Springer, in status it appears "Under Review", it means that it has already been approved by the editor and has gone through peer review? Editor assigned; Types of articles "Reject and Resubmit" status; Decision in process; Conflict of interest; See more. Editors will consider the peer-reviewed reports when making a decision, but are not bound by the opinions or recommendations therein. Based on the topic of the manuscript and suggestions by the authors, an editor is assigned to handle the manuscript. For most journals, especially Elsevier journals, the status "With Editor" means that the Editor has not performed the initial screening of the paper. From "Manuscript Submitted" to "with editor" took one day; then it was "with editor" for five days, and then "under review". Then, it changed back to "Reviewers Assigned". For the next two days, reviewers were assigned and then the status again changed to under review for 10 days, and then finally to "required reviews completed". The journal website states that it takes an average of 91 days from submission to first decision. The status changed to ‘Reviewer assigned’ approximately three times every three months. Once the journal sends reviewer invitations and the reviewers accept them, peer review will start and the status will change to "Under review. Peer reviewers are experts who volunteer their time to help improve the journal manuscripts they review—they offer authors free advice. If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience After Associate Editor is assigned, they will invite reviewers. initial about 1 month, the online tracking system has been showing "with Editor" as the current status. I revised the paper and sent it again. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Once the decision has been made to peer-review the paper, the choice of referees is made by the editor who has been assigned the manuscript, who will be handling other papers in the same field, in The fact that the status changed from "Required Reviews Completed" to "Under Review" could mean that the editor has received all reviews from the reviewers and is currently in the process of I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. The status "Editor assignment pending" means that your paper has still not been assigned to an editor. After the submission of the second revision, the status was Under Review for 20 days. In this case, Reviews Completed might refer to the admin review, rather than to the associate editor (AE) or the peer review. Address all points raised by the editor and reviewers. One of the reviewers also suggested revising for additional data. ’ I would like to know whether ‘Under review’ means an internal or an external I had submitted a manuscript to a Springer journal. After seven months I was asked by the editor to make major revisions. Could you please explain to me what does this Stage 2: Editor assigned Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. The status turned to "Under Review" after two weeks and remained the same for four months. " What does this mean? Stage 2: Editor assigned Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. Some journals also use the "Under review" status when the manuscript is under the initial editorial screening and use "reviewers assigned" or "reviewers invited" to indicate that your paper has been Are you a student at a higher institution or an early-career researcher who is striving to understand and master the peer review process so to increase the odds of getting a paper published in the Journal of Forestry Research or another reputable, peer-reviewed, scientific journal? In this paper, a young, senior editor provides a handbook of the peer review I submitted the manuscript to a Springer medical journal. It is slightly concerning that an editor would be invited after 8 months of submission. Does every journal follow the Some journals send reviewers the comments of other reviewers on the same manuscript along with the decision letter; reading these comments can help you improve your future reviews. But, after that, the status changed to "Under review" for three days, and then it changed to "Reviewers assigned" again. Some journals also invite editors to handle the manuscript correspondence depending on the topic. Currently, the status of my manuscript has been ‘Editor Assigned’ and it has been showing the same status for one month. The Editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned guidelines. If the status doesn’t change in this period, you could write to the journal seeking an update. Sending in a review long after the deadline will delay the publication process and frustrate the editor and authors. The time taken for the different stages in the submission process varies across journals, but it is quite normal for the status to show “With editor” for over a month after initial submission. With some journals, editors are invited and not assigned. What does it mean? Has it received good reviews or The status "Reviewer assignment pending" clearly indicates that your paper has not yet been sent for peer review. , the editor's workload was too heavy, the editor has an ongoing medical or family emergency, or the editor felt another editor would be better equipped to handle your paper). At this stage, the editor is diligently analysing the feedback, weighing the merits and shortcomings of the manuscript, and The life of a Springer Editorial Manager System Manuscript short, my R3 has been successfully submitted and I am waiting for the journal editor's decision on my Ms (Oh now it's under review as of Mar 7,10, and 11 2014). ' However, after 15 days, it again changed to I have submitted a Manuscript to a springer journal about 4 month ago. Also in most cases, the AE will receive an e-mail to notify him that the minimum number of reviews has been received and he must submit a decision within a couple of days / week. The status “reviewers assigned” indicates that the reviewers accepted the invitation to review your paper. Keep in mind that reviewing manuscripts, like research and teaching, is a valuable contribution to science, and is worth making time for Send a polite email to the editor assigned to my manuscript – after the introductory pleasantries, politely get to the point, asking something along the lines of: I'll add that while review times can vary wildly between fields, often if the status hasn't changed to "under review" after say 3 weeks or so, it might mean that the handling I submitted a paper in an Elsevier journal. But after two days, the status changed to editor assigned. While Editorial Manager provides editors with the tools I submitted a manuscript to a reputed Springer journal. But the status was again changed to "editor assigned". If you write to them again, you might appear too pushy or The submission systems of some journals use the status "under review" even when the manuscript is under the initial editorial assessment. The online tracking system status was as follows: 17 Apr: New submission 18 Apr: Editor assigned 08 May: Under review 27 May: Reviews completed 29 May: Under review 06 Jun: Under review 25 Jun: Reviewers assigned. After 10 days, the status changed to "Editor Assigned". If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience Lead editors can reassign manuscripts at any time. Since last one month, the online tracking system has been showing "reviewers assigned" as the current status. Any idea what is happening to my manuscript with Springer? The status was "Editor assigned" for three months, then "Editor invited" for about three weeks, then "Editor assigned" again for another week as of today. “required reviews completed,” “with editor,” or “decision in process. The status changed to With Editor on February 28 and to Under Review on March 2/3. ” I submitted my manuscript to a journal. In some time, the manuscript will most likely be assigned to an Associate Editor (AE). xiveps xfrgwl ilud cwn enndn fdatdol lfe pdwk qzhxe jzvapow